The question seem to be incomplete but I found the complete question which is:
If you are performing this test on an unknown organism, why is it a good idea to run simultaneous tests on known phenylalanine-positive and phenylalanine-negative organisms?
Here is the Answer:
Inoculation of a positive control and success from it includes certainty to negative outcomes on an unknown organism. That is, you know the test is working effectively, so the negative outcome is most likely precise. Without the positive control, there is dependably a component of uncertainty whether the negative outcome is a genuine negative or a false negative. performing the test on a known phenlalanine-negative organism is valuable in that it exhibits what a negative outcome looks like.
Descriptions of both insect/bird
Both Miami blue butterflies and scrub jays have differ in this The scrub jays The “blue jay” of dry lowlands along the Pacific seaboard, the California Scrub-Jay combines deep azure blue, clean white underparts, and soft gray-brown. It looks very similar to the Woodhouse's Scrub-Jay (they were considered the same species until 2016), but is brighter and more contrasting, with a bold blue breast band.
Maimi Butterfly
Adults:The adults are small with a wingspan range of 22 to 31 mm. Females are generally larger than males. The sexes are dimorphic. The upper surface of the wings is bright blue in males. Females have reduced blue with wide gray wing borders and an orange-capped black spot along the outer margin of the hindwing. The undersides of the wings are gray in both sexes. The hindwing has a broad white submarginal band and four black postbasal spots.
Answer:
b. ventricles
The right and left ventricles
Hi there!
<u>Electronegativity</u> is the concept of how likely an atom is to attract the shared molecules in one of these bonds to itself. We know the molecule water is made up of two hydrogens and one oxygen. The electronegativity of hydrogen is 2.2, and oxygen 3.4. An <u>ionic bond</u> needs at least a difference in electronegativity of 1.6. As the difference is less than that, we can say that water is a covalent molecule. This then wipes out choice B, because it is not ionic, and C, as we have seen it is actually covalent.
Now, we can see the difference in electronegativity between oxygen and hydrogen is still 1.2. This means that while it is not at the point for there to be an ionic bond, there is still a difference in attraction, where the electrons will tend to favor the oxygen more and 'hang around it' more. As electrons are <u>negatively charged</u><em><u>,</u></em> this means that the oxygen will gain a slightly negative charge. This then makes the molecule polar, because it now has a charge within the molecule. This means we have our answer, choice D.
In terms of hydrophobic molecules - they tend to be ones without a charge. (If you're interested in this kind of stuff, I'd search hydrophobic up, and possibly also look into hydrogen bonds).
Hope this helps! Feel free to ask me any other questions you have about this specific problem.
