1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Step2247 [10]
3 years ago
5

Why does the presidential election matter to the future of the court?

History
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Presidential eletions have a huge impact on the future court. The president appoints justices to the court. As a result if any justice retires ,or passess away his seat on the court will be appointed by the sitting president. If the retiring justices is republican and the Demoncrates win the election the president will appoint someone to the seat who believes in the way he or she does. This can result in an unequal number of justices that believe and or support one political party over the other.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did the new movement known as Jansenism call for?
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

Jansenism was a theological movement within Catholicism, primarily active in France, that emphasized original sin, human depravity, the necessity of divine grace and predestination. The movement originated from the posthumously published work of the Dutch theologian Cornelius Jansen, who died in 1638. It was first popularized by Jansen's friend Abbot Jean du Vergier de Hauranne, of Saint-Cyran-en-Brenne Abbey, and, after du Vergier's death in 1643, was led by Antoine Arnauld. Through the 17th and into the 18th centuries, Jansenism was a distinct movement away from the Catholic Church. The theological center of the movement was the convent of Port-Royal-des-Champs Abbey, which was a haven for writers including du Vergier, Arnauld, Pierre Nicole, Blaise Pascal and Jean Racine

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
How did working in an American factory during the Industrial Revolution have a negative impact on a worker’s life? A. People wer
Julli [10]

the answer would be C because nobody really cared about there safety until the new act (forgot what it was called) came out and people would be in some of the worst conditions. no face masks, no safety guards, no nothin

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one way the colonist rebelled against british economic politics
Mademuasel [1]
<span>Many Americans viewed all of this as a blatant abuse of power by the British government. Once again a call went out for a colonial congress to sort out a response. On September 5, 1774 delegates appointed by the colonies met in Philadelphia for the First Continental Congress. Drawing upon the successful manner in which previous acts had been overturned the first thing Congress did was to organize a comprehensive embargo of trade with Britain. It then conveyed to the British government a list of grievances that demanded the repeal of thirteen acts of Parliament. All of the acts listed had been passed after 1763 as the delegates had agreed not to question British policies made prior to the conclusion of the Seven Years War. Despite all the problems it had created, the Tea Act was not on the list. The reason for this was that Congress decided not to protest British regulation of colonial trade under the Navigation Acts. In short, the delegates were saying to Parliament take us back to 1763 and all will be well.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
I need help please !!!!
andre [41]

Answer:

The government is created by the people, for the people, and while it is above the people in power, the power rests with the people. The creation of the government is to protect the common civilian by providing security and defense to the nation from external threats. The government also provides security and justice within to ensure that the public is as safe as possible. They also hold trials on the accused, providing justice if needed be. However, the accused also has rights, including the right to a lawyer, a fair trial, and a true justice. The Prosecution team also must prove that the accused is guilty, instead of the accused proving his innocence. The government provides these rights to it's civilians to ensure that the balance of power (the power held by the civilian v. the government) is balanced, and that the government cannot take total control.

~

8 0
2 years ago
Someone help me please
gayaneshka [121]

omgomgomgomgomgomgomomgomgomogmmgmogmogmgmog

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did France treat Algeria differently than its colonies in west and central Africa
    11·1 answer
  • What led to the viability of the Jamestown colony?
    14·1 answer
  • Who can officially declare war?
    15·1 answer
  • Fugitive slaves traveled to Pennsylvania using all of the following methods except railroads. wagons. walking. slave ships.
    10·2 answers
  • In the presidential campaign of 1860, which of the following positions was asserted by the Republican Party platform with respec
    5·1 answer
  • What does it mean to call someone a “Benedict Arnold”?
    11·2 answers
  • How Do I exactly Solve This I am quite confused on what my first step should be?
    15·1 answer
  • What happens if a defendant is found guilty of a violent crime during a trial in a Georgia courtroom?
    11·2 answers
  • On 2nd March Soviet leaders and the Duma leaders formed a​
    8·1 answer
  • Need help with this one
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!