1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
9

Which describes a difference in the rule of Constantine and Diocletian? Constantine appeased foreign invaders by giving them lan

d, while Diocletian went on the offensive to stop the attacks. Constantine divided the empire into western and eastern halves, while Diocletian further split the country into four regions. Constantine divided the empire and shared emperor duties, while Diocletian reunited the empire and served as sole ruler. Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.
History
2 answers:
ella [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:    The correct answer is D) Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.

The statement that describes a difference in the rule of Constantine and Diocletian was that Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.

Constantine I was the Roman Emperor from 306 to 337 CE. He reunited the split empire. What happened was that Emperor Diocletian had split the Roman Empire with different rulers in order to better control the territories. So Constantine reunited the Roman territories again under one government, changing the Capital from Rome to what would be Constantinople. Although the many renovations in the city, Constantine thought that Rome was old and did not want to stay there, that is why he chose Byzantium as the new place.

Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is D) Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.

<em>The statement that describes a difference in the rule of Constantine and Diocletian was that Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.</em>

Constantine I was the Roman Emperor from 306 to 337 CE. He reunited the split empire. What happened was that Emperor Diocletian had split the Roman Empire with different rulers in order to better control the territories. So Constantine reunited the Roman territories again under one government, changing the Capital from Rome to what would be Constantinople. Although the many renovations in the city, Constantine thought that Rome was old and did not want to stay there, that is why he chose Byzantium as the new place.

You might be interested in
Which of the following things did catherine ii do?
ivolga24 [154]

Answer:

I think that the answer may be c

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What territorial change resulted from the Peace of Paris (1763), which ended the Seven Years' War?
ehidna [41]
The French gave up all of their territories in mainland North America, ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies.
7 0
3 years ago
What would happen if the ice caps melted
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

If the ice caps melted, more sun rays would reach earth. The ice reflects the sunrays but if they disapperead then the sunrays would not be reflected this would increase the effects of global warming. Also water levels would rise since the ice would have melted. meaning beaches might have higher water levels. Also alot animals that lived on the ice caps would die since their  natural habitat would be destroyed.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the oil embargo in the 1970s affect the US economy?
elena-s [515]
The price of oil doubled per barrel, then quadrupled and challenged the stability of the whole national economy.
8 0
2 years ago
Why did the creoles oppose the presence of the peninsulars?
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

Explanation:

La historiografía tradicional sobre las independencias ha tendido a considerar éstas como el resultado de un conflicto de naciones, guerras de liberación nacional, en el que unas preexistentes naciones americanas se liberaban de una también preexistente nación española. En esta interpretación la existencia de dos formas de identidad colectiva de carácter protonacional, criollos (nacidos en América) y peninsulares (nacidos en Europa) ha tenido un papel determinante. Las guerras de independencia habrían sido el resultado de un enfrentamiento entre identidades colectivas definidas por el lugar de nacimiento. Una afirmación que hoy muy pocos historiadores se atreverían a mantener de forma explícita pero que sigue siento el trasfondo último del relato hegemónico sobre las independencias americanas.

2La propuesta de este trabajo es tanto discutir esta idea como desentrañar las funciones que ha cumplido en una historiografía que ha interpretado las guerras de independencia hispanoamericanas como guerras de liberación nacional. Para sustentar esta hipótesis se necesitó partir de la existencia previa de identidades colectivas con densidad política en el interior de la Monarquía Católica y lo más parecido que se encontró fue un supuesto conflicto criollos-peninsulares. Mi propuesta es que las naciones no fueron la causa de las guerras de independencia y que el enfrentamiento entre peninsulares y criollos, en el que la interpretación anterior se sustenta, es poco más que una bella leyenda, un mito historiográfico que forma parte del proceso de imaginación nacional latinoamericano y no de la realidad histórica.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you think that the permission granted by Mughal Emperor Jahangir to the English East India Company on trade concessions and p
    13·1 answer
  • The Ottoman Empire reached the peak of its power and grandeur in the 1500s during the rule of __________.
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Which statement describes the treatment of Asian Americans during World War I?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the word to describe the sum of an organization's values, traditions, beliefs, interactions, behaviors, and attitudes?
    12·2 answers
  • An argument made by anti-imperialists in the late 1800’s was that the united states:
    5·1 answer
  • How do I draw the words convince
    14·1 answer
  • What army defeated many Greek states and plunged Greece into a "dark age?"
    11·1 answer
  • Have a history test and am a bit stuck on this question!
    15·1 answer
  • Please hurry fast i will give more points to brainliest answer (yes.. i will do brainliest and i need it to be a little bit leng
    11·1 answer
  • 7. What do the Hoover Dam and Lincoln Tunnels have in common?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!