I think that part of a letter that Jimmy would write would focus on why he had to arrest Bob. The note that Jimmy writes to Bob when he is arrested would be a starting point as to why Jimmy would be disturbed: "Bob: I was at the appointed place on time. When you struck the match to light your cigar I saw it was the face of the man wanted in Chicago. Somehow I couldn't do it myself, so I went around and got a plain clothes man to do the job. JIMMY." For Jimmy, his letter to Bob would center about how he felt agonized in arresting him. In the line, "I couldn't do it myself," there might be the basis of a letter to Bob.
Jimmy would talk about how their friendship as kids, the personalities they both had, experienced a change as they became older. When Bob talks about how Jimmy was a bit of a "plodder," it might belie the fact that Bob has embraced breaking the law in order to find success. The letter that Jimmy writes to Bob might delve into this reality, one in which Jimmy has recognized the need to accept the law no matter what the cost. Jimmy's allegiance to the loyalty supersedes his loyalty to Bob, something that is evident in both the note he wrote to him as he was arrested, as well as the agony he feels now that he had to make the arrest. The letter to Bob would talk about how Jimmy felt agonized at doing what he did. Perhaps, it might involve a level of pleading to Bob that he would understand, or it might be more informative in terms of explaining his actions, but I think that the letter to Bob would be rooted in much of what the note to Bob indicated.
Explanation:
Answer:
el ni el recomendado es de 5
The correct answer is: Strict and unfair.
In paragraph 3 of "A women who went to Alaska," the narrator describes the Canadian Dominion governmen as "oppressive" because it imposed and strictly enforced arbitraty laws.
It charged miners a large amount of money to get a license for mining and a ten percent royalty on all of the gold digged.
more info is needed for this question im sorry
Having many friends and having few friends is obviously thinking of the amount of friends without caring much about quality. It's good to have few friends, but to have true friends.
It is always preferable to have quality friendships. Friendships built on trust, caring, love, understanding and reciprocity. A friendship between two people is between two people, never a single part. It has to have both parts. It must be a friendship strengthened in personal, intimate, and deep knowledge, to the point of this friendship overcoming difficulties, confusion, misunderstandings, quarrels, everything. This kind of friendship is built with quality. And nowadays few people possess those characteristics or are willing to acquire them. That is why friendship should never be based on quantity, on the largest number of friends. If we have few friends but friends with these characteristics, we know that they are real friends.
