Hey there! A word no longer in common use but retained in a language because it preserves the flavor of a period is a archaic word.
Answer:
D). Drawing from common experiences.
Explanation:
As per the given description, Ella is 'drawing from common experiences' as it helps her to present the speech in a conversational yet associative manner through which the audience would be able to connect more conveniently and effectively. The use of 'common experiences' like 'Remember how we empathized with the victims when an earthquake was reported' not only helps to establish a relation between the audience and the content of the speech but also helps establish the credibility of the claim. Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
hello there! :)
you can use formal diction when you want to entertain, amuse, inform, or plead someone. words chosen to impart a particular effect on the reader reflect and sustain the writer's purpose. if your purpose is to inform, the reader should expect straightforward diction.
<em>hope this helps! comment down below my answer if you want any futher help❤ from peachimin (aka kayla)</em>
A home sick country boy living in the storm
Answer:
Nietzsche’s philosophical thoughts on morality argue that a moral code is not in our nature, while
Zimbardo’s argument is that we shouldn’t expect our decisions to be
influenced by morality alone. Nietzsche’s thoughts on morality are
grounded in opposition to Christianity. He begins his argument by
quoting from the Bible, “If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out,” before
labeling the Christian idea as “stupidity” (Paragraph 1). Nietzsche argues
that sensuality is in opposition to Christianity and that the church
“always wanted the destruction of its enemies; we, we immoralists and
Antichristians” (Paragraph 5), adding that “Life has come to an end
where the ‘kingdom of God’ begins” (Paragraph 8). In contrast, Zimbardo
bases his argument on science and proposes that the electric shock
experiment by psychologist Stanley Milgram “provides several lessons
about how situations can foster evil” (Paragraph 5). He also uses
conclusions from a 1974 experiment by Harvard anthropologist John
Watson, as well as his own simulated jail experiment, the 1971 Stanford
Prison Experiment, to help support his argument.
