<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
It limit the power of the king.
Declared that the people have rights.
Answer:
i do not understand im cunfused pls provide more info
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
It obviously would not be B, because destroyed clothes is not a behavior. It would not be A, because bullies tend to be good manipulators, therefore losing friends would not be an issue. Lastly, bullies tend to blame others for their actions, so C would be out of the equation. Those who bully are highly aggressive towards others, proving that D would be a reasonable and correct answer to your question.
