Answer:
A. Non sequitur
Explanation:
Non Sequitur is a type of logical fallacy that forms a conclusion or response that is not logically connected to the previous statement.
From the example, <em><u>Ever since the new casino opened unemployment in this city has gotten out of control </u></em>, there is no logical connection between the increased unemployment in the city and the new casino.
There would have been a logical conclusion if the statement was written like this,
<em>People who are caught gambling are fired, so since the new casino opened, the unemployment in the city has gotten out of control.</em>
<em></em>
People who are caught gambling are fired is the premise and connects the next statements about unemployment rates increasing and the new casino in town.
Therefore, the logical fallacy that takes place is Non sequitur as it has no logical connection to the premise.
Answer:
B). The writer repeats the word “deadly” so much that it becomes alarming.
Explanation:
The sentence 'the writer....alarming' would most aptly assist in expanding the paragraph and offers evidence that the author opts for a deft style and his descriptions help in making the fact more reasonable and dramatic. <u>The repetition of the word 'deadly' makes the description more frightening and alarming. It gives a hint to the readers that something fatal or shocking is about to happen</u>. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
It would go in order the way it's put
Explanation:
The cause is that the interest in balloons grows so the first effect/cause would be that inventors develp hydrogen balloons, the second effect/cause is a balloon filled with hydrogen is launched, and the final effect is the very first hot air balloon is launched. I am sorry if this was confusing.
Answer:
You can get more information and most of the time you can get more POVs and different perpectives.
Explanation:
