1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sleet_krkn [62]
3 years ago
9

To what extent was Mussolini responsible for the failure of the league?

History
1 answer:
Nookie1986 [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Benito Mussolini was an extremely influential figure in Europe in the 1930s. Many argue that Mussolini was responsible for the downfall and eventual failure of the League of Nations. Mussolini wanted to regain the Roman Empire to it's former glory, and initiated his nationalistic plan with the invasion of Abyssinia in 1935.

You might be interested in
Because of the activities of people like Klaus Fuchs, Harry Gold, and David Greenglass, the 1940s and 1950s can be called an age
tamaranim1 [39]
It was called the age of <span>espionage</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When South Korea was invaded by North Korea, direct military assistance to resist aggression came from
mrs_skeptik [129]
The United States aided South Korea during the Korean War.
3 0
2 years ago
In 1990 Saddam Hussein, dictator of Iraq, ordered his military to invade what nation?
FinnZ [79.3K]
They onvaded kuwait. ......
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The original Mesopotamian writing system first came from a system of clay tokens used to count agricultural goods. By the end of
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

cuneiform

Explanation:

Tried :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would Federalists most likely respond to this?
aleksklad [387]

For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>

The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.

The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.

The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.

Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What role did the state (western virginia in the new nation) play in education
    15·1 answer
  • Unlike liberal critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal, conservative critics
    14·2 answers
  • Federalist paper No 30 includes the passage “…there must be interwoven, in the frame of the government, a general power of taxat
    11·2 answers
  • "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un
    14·2 answers
  • What is the important geographic feature in southeastern Colombia? desert grasslands rainforest mountains
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the patriot act raise civil rights questions?
    8·2 answers
  • Why do you think hammurabi was so honored for his code of laws
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the difference between immigration to the United States before and after 1830
    5·1 answer
  • Why is the United States been so opposed to communism
    9·1 answer
  • How did Imperialism change Japan?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!