Answer:
C. Shows the percentage of potential gross income consumed by operating expenses
<u><em>Mark Brainliest if this helps... ^^</em></u>
Answer:exit role =A straight-A student decides to quit her sorority to focus on her grades.
conflict role = A straight-A student who spent most of her time studying in high school joins a sorority and faces increased pressure to spend less time studying
strain role=Fraternity and sorority members are required to devote a significant amount of time to social events and community service each semester.
Explanation:Exit role , as the word exit mean leaving , exit role also refers to actual abandoning a certain role , probably because that role is not as crucial as other roles in your life. I.e leaving sorority group for your studies.
Conflict role means you facing two equally demanding roles , which are competing against each other and it difficult for you to balance between these roles.
Strain role refers to a role that is demanding and may be straining you .
<span>The Public Works programs were highly effective in helping to end the Depression, as they employed people, thus allowing them to buy manufactured goods, which in turn increased manufacturing companies confidence and willingness to invest. This willingness to invest would in turn result in either making more products or creating new products, thus creating jobs to make these products, employing more people and in turn allowing them to buy more manufactured products. This cycle would continue until investment and personal expenditures leveled out at a equilibrium that was higher than before the Public Works programs were implemented.</span>
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
