Answer:
the government must protect the right of citizens
Answer: down below
Explanation:
One of the most fundamental differences between Buddhism and Hinduism is their view on the existence of god. Hindus worship numerous deities. ... On the other hand, Buddhists deny the existence of many gods. Instead, they believe in the existence of one god, but they do not believe it is necessary to seek god.
Hinduism, which emerged about 3,500 years ago, and Buddhism, which started around 2,800 years ago, are two of the world’s main religions, both of which originated in India.
Hinduism worships Brahman — the supreme lifeforce from which atman (souls) and many other gods originate, however Buddhism worships incarnations of one god — Buddhas. Both believe in a continuing cycle of life, suffering, death, and rebirth, but for Buddhists the goal of enlightenment is call nirvana, while it is called moksha in Hinduism.
Hinduism and Buddhism are like twins sharing a lot of the same terminology and concepts, but each has its own distinguishing features.Let's learn the 3 major similarities and 7 major differences between Hinduism and Buddhism as below.
I added extra information so you could decide which facts you’d prefer to use in your paper!
I hope this helps! Please mark me Brainliest if you can!
have a blessed day!
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Lars is completing a history project about World War I. On the British government's National Archives website, he finds letters from American soldiers as well as documents written by museum curators and historians that give background information about the war, supported by primary sources from their archives' collections.
Which descriptions best characterize this information? Select three options.
a. outdated facts, b. credible sources, c. primary sources, d. biased information
, e. reasoned judgment
Answer:
b. credible sources
c. primary sources
e. reasoned judgment
Explanation:
Primary sources are documents that were made and built at the time the historic event they document is taking place. In that case, they can claim that the letters that American soldiers wrote during the First World War are a primary source.
A credible source is one that is written by an expert on a given subject, in addition, these sources have evidence that supports all the statements they present. When Lars uses historical sources written by curators and historians who used primary sources as evidence, he is using credible feints.
After doing this research, Lars will be able to draw conclusions about the first world war using these sources as evidence, thus making an easoned judgment.
Answer:
Bad guys isn't the best way to describe the losers of World War 1. However, the standard answer, the one you'd see Hollywood point to, are the Central Powers: . German Empire
, Austria-Hungary
, Ottoman Empire
Explanation:
In 1914, Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb nationalist, assassinated Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand. This was the culmination of a simmering regional conflict that ingnighted WW1.
