1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jarptica [38.1K]
3 years ago
13

The U.S. customary system of measurement is a decimal system. True False

History
2 answers:
algol [13]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: it is true

Explanation:

seraphim [82]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

A system of measurement is a collection of units of measurement and rules relating them to each other. Systems of measurement have historically been important, regulated and defined for the purposes of science and commerce. Systems of measurement in use include the International System of Units (SI), the modern form of the metric system, the imperial system, and United States customary units

You might be interested in
A coordinated effort of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC
Leno4ka [110]
I think the answer is a) Freedom Summer.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was agamemnon selfish?
sukhopar [10]
Because ud didn't pay attention in his mettings
3 0
3 years ago
What role did politics change global relations between countries in modern era?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:The United States is today the only truly global power. Its military reach—whether on land, at sea, or in the air—extends to every point on the globe. Its economic prowess fuels world trade and industry. Its political and cultural appeal—what Joseph Nye has called soft power—is so extensive that most international institutions reflect American interests. America’s position in the world is unique—no other country in history has ever come close.

But is America’s exalted position sustainable? Militarily, the vast gap between the United States and everyone else is growing. Whereas defense spending in most other countries is falling, U.S. defense spending is rising rapidly. This year’s requested increase in defense spending is greater than the entire Chinese defense budget. Most remarkably, America can afford to spend more. Defense spending takes a smaller share of the U.S. gross domestic product than it did a decade ago—and even the Bush administration’s projected increases will produce an overall budget equal to only about 3.5 percent of GDP, about half of Cold War highs. There is little prospect of any country or group of countries devoting the resources necessary to begin competing with the United States militarily, let alone surpassing it.

Economically, the United States may not widen its edge over its competitors, but neither is it likely to fall behind. The U.S. economy has proven itself at least as adept as its major competitors in realizing the productivity gains made possible by information technology. Europe and Japan face severe demographic challenges as their populations rapidly age, creating likely labor shortages and severe budgetary pressures. China is modernizing rapidly, and Russia may have turned the corner, but their economies today are comparable in output to those of Italy and Belgium—and they have yet to develop a political infrastructure that can support sustained economic growth.

Which brings us to the issue of how to transform this unquestioned power into influence. Unless employed deftly, America’s military and economic superiority can breed resentment, even among its friends. A growing perception that Washington cares only about its own interests and is willing to use its muscle to get its way has fueled a worrisome gap between U.S. and European attitudes. European elites increasingly criticize the United States as being morally, socially, and culturally retrograde—especially in its perceived embrace of the death penalty, predatory capitalism, and fast food and mass entertainment. Europe has also begun to exercise diplomatic muscle in international institutions and other arenas, seeking to create new international regimes designed to limit America’s recourse to its hard power.

Explanation:

eptember 11 signaled the end of the age of geopolitics and the advent of a new age—the era of global politics. The challenge U.S. policymakers face today is to recognize that fundamental change in world politics and to use America’s unrivaled military, economic, and political power to fashion an international environment conducive to its interests and values.

For much of the 20th century, geopolitics drove American foreign policy. Successive presidents sought to prevent any single country from dominating the centers of strategic power in Europe and Asia. To that end the United States fought two world wars and carried on its four-decade-long Cold War with the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet empire ended the last serious challenge for territorial dominion over Eurasia. The primary goal of American foreign policy was achieved.

During the 1990s, American foreign policy focused on consolidating its success. Together with its European allies, the United States set out to create, for the first time in history, a peaceful, undivided, and democratic Europe. That effort is now all but complete. The European Union—which will encompass most of Europe with the expected accession of 10 new members in 2004—has become the focal point for European policy on a wide range of issues. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has evolved from a collective defense alliance into Europe’s main security institution. A new relationship with Russia is being forged.

Progress has been slower, though still significant, in Asia. U.S. relations with its two key regional partners, Japan and South Korea, remain the foundation of regional stability. Democracy is taking root in South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Taiwan. U.S. engagement with China is slowly tying an economically surging Beijing into the global economy.

5 0
2 years ago
What Type of boeing 747 operates Air force one
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

The 2nd one, your welcome

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Blank was an international organization designed to prevent war that was set up after World War 1.
MatroZZZ [7]
Answer is: <span>League of Nations.
League of Nations was formed at the end of WWI (10 January 1920) a result of the Paris Peace Conference. League of Nations was first international institution whose mission was to maintain world peace. At 1935 it has 58 members (states). The League of Nations endured for 26 years.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Congress voted to annex texas:
    14·1 answer
  • How would a person struggling with poverty be treated in the middle ages; the elizabethan era and early colonial america?
    5·1 answer
  • How were daily lives changed by new technology in the 1920s
    14·1 answer
  • What is the solution of the equation (x - 5)2 + 3x – 5) + 9 = 0?
    7·1 answer
  • Which river has the most commercial traffic?
    14·2 answers
  • Hi there I wanted to ask you guys if someone can please help me write a 1 paragraph (4 sentences) about the Oregon measures 107,
    14·1 answer
  • Think about the information you have read about the 1960 presidential election. Write a list of reasons for Kennedy’s victory. Y
    5·1 answer
  • A consequence of Germany promising Austria a "blank check" was that:________.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Reformation can be inferred from
    7·1 answer
  • What effect did the trade route between Manila and Acapulco have on the Spanish colony of Louisiana?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!