WOW..... really good stuff depending on if your teacher wants you to go into full detail, maybe you could elaborate on the punic wars maybe saying that Hannibal was finally defeated after 15 years in Italy and it was by <span>Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama. But really good stuff I'm glad people actually care about history these days :)</span>
Answer:
The five values determined by Tocqueville's Democracy in America was
Liberty
Egalitarianism
Individualism
Populism
Laissez-faire
Explanation:
One important values from de Tocqueville's Democracy in America was Egalitarianism which means society of Equals.
The three exceptions Tocqueville saw was:
Slavery
Women and
Treatment of Native Americans
Steps were also taken to protect or restore the value in America
In America, the wealth, power and intelligence were different among the people but they are equal in the society.
The land which was available free was equally promoted among the people.
This makes the American people to see their neighbors as equal and they started to contribute the feeling of equality.
Tocqueville believed that Safeguarding Liberty should be the primary concern of the nation. Because it makes the Americans to be economically prosperous.
Explanation:
A, gold, they did not know that there was gold and if so, it was not verified
Answer:
Explanation:
The value of political equality is central to normative theories of democracy: it is argued that women are equal citizens and therefore should share equally with men in public decision-making. By contrast, empirical theories typically define democracy by the presence of institutions such as a multi-party political system and competitive elections. In fact, the concept of empirical democracy may encompass a complex range of practical realities, including cultural, socio-economic, and political factors. This multifaceted understanding of empirical democracy is used to help explain the descriptive representation of women in national parliaments. The goal of the article is to advance understanding about which factors help or hinder women in entering parliament in countries defined as democratic. Its principal argument is that these factors differ according to the length of the democratic experiment. The analysis shows first that the proportion of women in parliaments is influenced by a plurality of interacting factors. Second, it shows that the mix of factors influencing the percentage of female legislators differs according to the length of the country's democratic experience. In countries where democracy has prevailed for only a short time, the voting system is the most important factor explaining the proportion of women parliamentarians. By contrast, in well-established democracies the most powerful explanation is found in an egalitarian conception of gender roles. The conclusions reminds us that empirical democracy is a complex, heterogeneous, and multifaceted phenomenon; consequently, analysis intended to reach a better understanding of the presence of women in parliaments must refrain from uniformly applying indicators to all countries, the realities of which are, in fact, quite different.
