Answer:
18 units
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
= 
= 18 units
At 18 units of order size, the total cost would minimize.
It is that level at which the total carrying cost and the total ordering cost is equal.
Total cost = Purchase cost + ordering cost + carrying cost
It is a combination of purchase cost, ordering cost and the carrying cost
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Hey :)
I would say it’s b) Claim or argument that an error was made
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Just use G maps and search stakehouse.
Explanation:
Answer:
The minimum price which the company should not go below is $26.00
Explanation:
The minimum price which the company should not go below is the price which covers all cost of manufacturing and non-manufacturing to meeting the special, one-time-only order.
Thus we need to calculate the per unit cost of the special order.
<u>Unit cost of the special order</u>
Direct materials $ 13.00
Direct labor $ 7.00
Variable manufacturing overhead $ 6.00
Total Cost $26.00
Note
All fixed cost are<em> irrelevant</em> in this calculation as the cost would be incurred whether or not the special order is accepted.
Also the question specifically mentioned that "There would be no variable selling expense on this special order" We need not to include any variable selling expense
