Answer:
A). Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
B). Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
E). Thinking about a possible counterclaim.
Explanation:
As per the question, when the negative or opponent is presenting claim with along with the evidence one is required to <u>'pay complete attention to what he/she says'</u> as it would help in preparing the counterclaim accordingly and more efficiently to rebut or neglect his ideas. Then, <u>'Identification of important pieces of evidence that the negative uses'</u> as it help produce sufficient rebuttal evidence to counter it efficiently. Next, would be <u>'Thinking about a possible counterclaim'</u> to deny his claim and establish the credibility of his claim. Thus, <u>options A, B, and E</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
Relative clause
Explanation:
It's a Relative Clause because of the relative pronoun 'whose'
Answer:
Paragraph rewritten with consistency: " In the story, "The Valiant Woman" by J. J. Powers, we find that in judging people we overlook most of the characteristics that draw us to him (them), but we do so without realizing it. You (we) can draw inaccurate conclusions about a person by misjudging their facial expressions, their physical stamina, and their obvious personality traits. When people (we) are blinded by false superiority, they (we) judge a person incorrectly because they (we) fail to see them as they really are."
Explanation:
To generate consistency in the above passage, you must keep the message linked to a single narrative, keeping pronouns fixed to something or someone. For this it is necessary that you when speaking with readers always use the pronouns "we", "us", while, when referring to the people being judged, always use the pronouns "they" and "them". In this way the passage will show consistency, as shown above.
