Answer: Option (B)
Explanation:
Condition subsequent clause is referred to as an exit clause from the existing contract. This agreement in between the parties tends to include languages that loosens or frees one of individuals from the agreement or the deal. This tends to mostly occur when the conditional outcome or result takes place. The conditional subsequent relieves an individual or a party from all the obligations.
Answer:
b. 2,100
Explanation:
On January will be collected: a) 10% January´s sales because is collected in cash; b) 40% December´s sales because is collected one month following the sale, and 50% November sales because the balance is collected two months following the sale.
So we can calcula like follows:
Expected cash receipts in January = (4,000 * 0.10) + (3,000 * 0.40) + (1,000 * 0.50)
Expected cash receipts in January = 400 + 1,200 + 500
Expected cash receipts in January = 2,100
Answer:
both Gladys and Phil
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario both Gladys and Phil are guilty of violating the Fair Housing Law. The Fair Housing law completely outlaws the refusal to sell a house or property to someone on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin. Which is exactly why Gladys and Phil removed the property and did not want to sell to the minority couple.
Answer:
<em>The answer is 17.01 minutes</em>
Explanation:
<em>Given that:</em>
<em>The learning rate (r) = 85% = 0.85</em>
<em> T₃₂= 23.52 minutes</em>
<em>By applying the learning curve formula</em>
<em>Thus,</em>
<em>Tₙ = T₁ nᵇ</em>
<em>Where b represent ln(r)/ln2</em>
<em>b = ln( 0.85)/ln2 = -0.2344</em>
<em>23.55 = T₁ * (32)^-0.2344</em>
<em>T₁ = 23.55 * (32)^0.2344</em>
<em>Now,</em>
<em>T₁₂₈ = T₁ (128)^ - 0.2344</em>
<em>= 23.55 * (32)^0.2344 * (128)^ - 0.2344</em>
<em>=17.01 minutes</em>
Answer:
less reliable than the appraiser's.
Explanation:
in such a scenario the broker's opinion of value will be less reliable than the appraiser's. This is mainly because the broker does not have all the information that the appraiser has and is making his opinion without this information, which may lead to unforeseen consequences that would not otherwise occur if the broker had this information and was able to see a much bigger picture of the situation to incorporate into his opinion.
