Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
stratified sample
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
she can use all 63 beads because 67 divided by 9 is 7 remainder 4
According to the table shown, the function that best represents g (x) is the function g (x) = 2x. This can be shown with the values of the table because if x = -1 then g (-1) = - 2. If x = 0 then g (0) = 0. And if x = 1 then g (1) = 2.
While for f (x) we have:
x f (x)-1 -80 01 8
Then f (x) = 4g (x)