Answer:
yea
Explanation:
isnt it a military college?
Indira Gandhi negotiated a treaty to establish the Islamic nation of Bangladesh describes one of Indira Gandhi's major accomplishments.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The India-Pakistan war of 1971 was itself a step taken to free East Pakistan region from the clutches of West Pakistan.
It was on the orders of the then Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi, that the war took place. Moreover, Indira Gandhi was against the formation of an independent Sikh State.
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. Supreme court has unlimited jurisdiction.
My only doubt is supreme court cases can be overruled but only by the supreme court (which is A).
Here are the correct matches for presidents and election years:
- 1960 = Kennedy
- 1964 = Johnson
- 1968 = Nixon
- 1974 = Ford ... though that was not an election. He became president when Nixon resigned.
- 1976 = Carter
- 1980 = Reagan
- 1988 = Bush Sr. (George H.W. Bush)
- 1992 = Clinton
- 2000 = Bush Jr. (George W. Bush)
Answer:
Considering these questions:
1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)
<em />
<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>
<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>
<em>
c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>
2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?
Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>
