The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Answer:
C. was considered by Jefferson to be practically worthless, yet he did not want it to fall into British hands.
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe it is
<h3>B They worshipped the gods of the Canaanites </h3>
Explanation:
I hope dis helps
Answer:
WWII acted as a catalyst to India's fight for independence but not before the British almost lost India to Netaji's Indian National Army.
The Second World War accelerated the movement toward decolonization. Japanese victories over the US, France, Britain and the Netherlands showed that the western countries were not invincible. To keep the loyalty of their largest colony during the war, the British promised independence to India.
Explanation:
Answer:
California which has 53 Representatives
