If an in-court identification is influenced by an out-of-court identification it is called an Tainted identification.
- A court is a type of institution with the power to adjudicate legal disputes between individuals or several parties in a certain way in accordance with the rules established by the judicial system. The court will resolve civil, administrative, and criminal cases in various ways.
- When we talk about evidence that has been tainted by out-of-court identification, we mean that it has been altered or destroyed in some way. It is believed that confessions obtained by the law illegally or under duress and witness identifications made under duress are tainted.
To know more about legal disputes visit:
https://brainly.in/question/25699574
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>East Asian societies largely controlled their own affairs until the Nineteenth Century.</u>
Explanation:
Note that historical reports suggest that up until the Nineteenth century East Asian societies largely controlled their own affairs after the arrival of the Europeans.
Remember also that at the time East Asia constitutes of modern day China, Hong Kong, Macao, Mongolia, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan.
Answer:
The sociometric/peer acceptance category of controversial relates to children who are noticed by peers and are liked by a quite a few children and disliked by quite a few others.
Explanation:
<u>A sociometric status is a measurement that shows how liked or disliked children are by their peers.</u> It can be divided into five categories: popular, rejected, neglected, average, or controversial. <u>The controversial category is the one that answers our question. It refers to children who are liked by quite a few children and disliked by quite a few others. Children who belong to this category have qualities that can be perceived as good or bad by others.</u> For instance, they tend to be prone to anger, and may seem a bit snobbish. On the other hand, they can also be sociable, cooperative, and good at sports.
Answer:
The correct option is D: taking the cost into account because money spent on pollution reduction is not available for other worthy activities
Explanation:
According to Lawrence Summers analysis, every spend for healthcare needs to be beneficial to the economy at the lowest possible cost. Hence looking at it from his point of view, it would be more moral to reduce pollution, looking at the cost of doing this. This is because there are other aspects that need money and if this money is spent on pollution without considering other areas, then there would not be enough money available for other worthy activities.
