Answer:
According to the passage, the Israelites receive a king because
✔ they ask for one
.
Samuel warns the Israelites that they and their king must
✔ obey God
.
Samuel promises that, if they do not,
✔ God will turn against them
.
Explanation:
its right
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the text or the document to know what you are talking about.
However, doing some deep research, we can say the following.
One way in which the document reflects the specific historical situation of Spain’s maritime exploration and colonization in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries is the moment the document expresses the following: <em>"On behalf of the king and queen of Spain, we notify you that the pope has donated to them these islands and lands and all who have received this notice should receive and serve their Highnesses as subjects ought to do. We ask that you acknowledge the Church and the pope as the ruler of the whole world."</em>
But the monarchy of Spain -in an arrogant way, felt it had the power to impose its will because paragraphs later, the document threatens the Native Indians of the region in the following way:<em> "But if you do not obey, we shall powerfully enter into your country, and shall make war against you and shall subject you to the yoke and obedience of the Church and the king and queen of Spain."</em>
Those ideas were taken from the document titled "The Demand," issued by the council of Castile in 1510.
Let's have in mind that Spanish King Ferdinand de Aragon and Queen Isabella del Castile sponsored the trip of Christopher Columbus to explore and discover a new maritime route to the West Indies. As we know, he ended up discovering the American Continent on October 12, 1492. When the Spanish explorers realized that the new territory was full of raw materials and natural resources, they wanted to conquer and colonize, the new lands to exploit the natural resources and be rich, and to evangelize the Native American Indians to spread Catholicism.
I am going to have to say C.
The Bill of Rights says that a person that was accused of a serious crime, they have the right to have a jury decide if there’s enough evidence to put them in trial and if they decide the person is not guilty, they can’t force the person to have a second trial. Also, if they’re accused, they have the right to have a trial, as long as is not long after the accusation and the trial has to be public. A person accused of a crime has the right to have a jury decide the case. Somebody who is going on trial has the right to know why they are being accused of the crime and has the right to have witnesses speak during the trial. If a jury decides that somebody is guilty of a crime, their punishment can’t be too harsh.
The answer to your question is living
Organic means that the object or material was once living ?
