All categories

3 years ago

Claim: Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence.

History

2 answers:

Mila [183]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.

Explanation:

Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."

This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)

Pani-rosa [81]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The ethnic makeup of Australia and New Zealand convinced the British that these colonies were capable of self-government.

Explanation:

just took the test duh

You might be interested in

Why do the authors or the Declaration (Jefferson et al) feel that the colonies are OBLIGATED to become a free and independent co

Alinara [238K]

Answer:

Jefferson ended his draft by stating, "we do assert and declare these colonies to be free and independent states. Instead, they concentrated on Jefferson's list of grievances against King George and the British people. The delegates made some small changes to improve the Declaration's clarity and accuracy. One purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to explain their view of the purpose of human government. If you read the text of the Declaration, you will see that the signers believed that all men were created equal by God and that they possess certain unalienable rights

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ancient Greece did not develop near rivers. How<br> does that affect their civilization?

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

they raised goats and sheep because they could climb the mountains. they Also planted crops and took over other lands so they could develop the land

4 0

3 years ago

2 While the economy grew during the Reagan years of the 1980s, what was a negative result? O A large federal budget deficits OB

dem82 [27]

Answer:

i think its a but i dont know wait till someone conferms my answer

3 0

2 years ago

ndia's Ganges River, a vital natural resource, is thought to be seriously contaminated. Why has the government been slow in clea

Serga [27]

There's nothing a government can do to clean it up as long as 100 million
people keep dumping in it, and that will continue until an alien life form
spontaneously rises out of its sacred waters some moon-lit night and
terrorizes some town's people.

4 0

3 years ago

some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells, and some of you have come from areas where ypur quest for freedom left you b

madreJ [45]

The rhetorical device used in the text of the question is pathos, as we see that the author uses techniques that capture emotion, using words such as freedom, suffering and faith that refer to strong meanings and values for many people.

<h3 /><h3>Pathos</h3>

It is a rhetorical resource used in texts whose main objective is to cause the reader's emotion, through a persuasive way using empathy, anger and sympathy for a certain theme.

Therefore, through the use of the Pathos technique, the author is able to establish an emotional appeal with his audience, generating reflection or agreement with his textual argument.

Find out more information about pathos here:

brainly.com/question/13118125

6 0

2 years ago