Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
A pension fun act as an investor by (B) The company invests the money collected from employers and/or employees.
Can totally vary. Normally, it can create 1,000 dollars up to 2,000 dollars if it's a good investment.
Answer:
A liquidated damages clause
Explanation:
A liquidated damages clause or provision is included in an agreement specifying an amount of money that establishes the damages that will be recovered by one party in the event of another party's breach to the contract.
Liquidated damages are agreed upon by parties to the contract at the time of signing the agreement.
In this scenario, the provision of $1,000 in the agreement constitutes a liquidated damages clause.