The Russian revolutionaries wanted something more than famine and injustice -- and that's much of what existed in Russia at that time. They wanted equality for all persons. That was a big goal of the communist agenda, and the Russian Revolution was a communist endeavor. They wanted to achieve that equality both in terms of wealth/property and in terms of political status and rights.
Was it dangerous? Absolutely. The reign of the tsars had gone on in Russia for centuries, and military victory over the tsar's armies had to be won for the revolution to succeed. And it was not going to be easy to make the nation better off, even after the revolution. The people would expect results from the new government. Those results were going to be hard to achieve.
Over time, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), which was the nation brought about by the Russian Revolution, has to become more and more authoritarian and repressive to keep its agenda going. And eventually that agenda failed, when about 75 years after the revolution, the USSR's government collapsed.
Answer:
The Gadsden Purchase
Explanation:
It later became part of New Mexico and Arizona
It true it was the spark and beginning of ww1
The correct answer is D.
The creation of free trade zones is a trade policy that consist on opening the national markets to foreign agents and therefore on eliminating trade barriers with other countries. The possibility of free entry attracts foreign capital and leads to higher levels of investment. Those new projects started with foreign money will need workers to function, and therefore will end up increasing employment too.
Such approach is opposite to the establishment of protectionist measures, which consist on setting trade barriers (custom duties such as tarriffs, quotas, etc.), and that would lead to the results explained in options A, B and C. It tariffs are set the goverment would increase the income earned from charging customs duties and the tariffs would prevent the free entrance of foreign competition. If the entry of foreign products and services is blocked is very likely that the influence of foreign countries decreases in South Korea.
Is this supposed to be multiple choice?
