Let's see there's forming, storming, norming and performing. I would use teambuilding during forming to limit the amount of storming in the next stage.
Answer:
Explanation:
Cablevision can easily accomplish this by doing the following. First gather the number of sales of premium services and other products that non-trained individuals are accomplishing in a given time period (example, one month). Next, under the same conditions place the newly trained individuals and gather the same data from them (number of sales/subscribers gained, premium products, and other products). Finally, they would simply need to compare the difference in the number of sales to see if the training paid off. They would also need to calculate if the difference in sales surpasses the costs of training.
Answer: The third option (option C) is the right answer.
Explanation:
The paragraph which has the best coherence is option C. This is because in the case of the third option, it explains that the flow of ideas is constant from one sentence to another.
The first sentence serves as an introduction which talked about the reasons why duties should be divided based on each member’s expertise. The sentences moved smoothly and also logically from one sentence to another sentence. An example is the sentence that “if your company does not have a public relations executive…..”. This should logically proceed the sentence that says that communication ought to be overseen by the director of PR.
This shows that the third option possesses a consistent and logical train of thought as well.
Answer:
c. Situational cognitive vulnerability.
Explanation:
Situational cognitive vulnerability -
It is the cognitive vulnerability in the field of cognitive psychology , it is the belief of cognitive bias .
It is the situation that does not allow to exercise the capabilities effectively .
hence , from the question ,
The correct term according to the statement of the question is - c. Situational cognitive vulnerability.
