Answer:
Okay thanks.. What does it show?
Explanation:
Answer: violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause
Explanation:
Plessy claimed the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause, which requires that a state must not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The Supreme Court disagreed with Plessy's argument and instead upheld the Louisiana law.
Yes because if the car is old and gets totaled you would want insurance to get some money back from your old car to put towards a new one
Yes Because its your fault your gonna need to pay for their damages. ( i live in Florida so ion know much bout that cause we a no fault state )
The move over law is the law that applies to the driver in the picture.
<h3>What is the Move over law?</h3>
This is the law that requires drivers to vacate the lane that is next to emergency vehicles that are stopped by the police.
The drivers have to give one lane gap to stopped emergency vehicles on the road in the United States.
B. The options to legally drive by includes:
- Emergency situations
- To go at a lower speed
- To move on a speed lower than the limit
Read more on the move over law here:
brainly.com/question/16643201?referrer=searchResults
Answer: discharge the contract
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Ruth contracts to provide Stan with fifty hours of telepathic personal coaching and that the state legislature subsequently passes a law making tele-pathic personal coaching illegal.
It should be noted that because of the law imposed by the legislature, the contract will be discharged. To discharge a contract simply means that the contract would be termination between Ruth and Stan. Such contract would cease to operate.
