Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
Answer:
That is easy. the Vice president has more important and busy job. HR doesn't deal with risks like the VP does. HR just isn't as important.
Answer:
B) by lending money at interest
Explanation:
Answer:
This is to ensure that there are enough checks and balances in the system to prevent the country’s decisions from being solely taken by just an individual in order to prevent mismanagement of public funds.
Explanation:
In the Article I of the US Constitution there is a provision that prevents the president from enacting a federal budget on his or her own, without the consent of other branches of the federal government.
This is to ensure financial accountability and prevent the high risk of misappropriation of funds if the President had the sole power to do so.
Search all campaign finance data
Research federal election data and its relevance across the country.
Help for candidates and committees
Help for individuals and groups who are active in federal elections.
Research legal resources
Explore relevant statutes, regulations, Commission actions and court cases.
