Answer:
I think the practice of restoring artworks is a very dangerous game. Artwork that has been around for centuries cannot be replaced and if they were to, somehow, get messed up during the restoration process then that is a large chunk of history that has been lost. However, I do believe that (if done right) artwork restoration can turn out beautiful as long as the person restoring the artwork is highly skilled and trained within this profession. Personally, I don't believe that the original artist's vision has been changed, just as long as nothing has been changed on the artwork (example: adding a bird or a tree to the painting that was not there before). In conclusion, if done right, art restoration can be a great thing but there is always the factor of danger added in.
If you were to multiply both numbers I think you would get 8.75 ft square
Answer:
Bakers prepare their cake pans before mixing the batter.
Explanation:
The study of Japanese art has frequently been complicated by the definitions and expectations established in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when Japan was opened to the West. The occasion of dramatically increased interaction with other cultures<span> seemed to require a convenient summary of Japanese </span>aesthetic<span> principles, and Japanese art historians and archaeologists began to construct </span>methodologies<span> to categorize and assess a vast body of material ranging from Neolithic pottery to wood-block prints. Formulated in part from contemporary scholarly </span>assessments<span> and in part from the syntheses of enthusiastic generalists, these theories on the characteristics of Japanese </span>culture<span> and, more</span>
