1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AURORKA [14]
3 years ago
12

Please help with this, will give brainliest

History
1 answer:
Stels [109]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C.) Forests in Finland

Explanation:

A is probably wrong because gold is a type of mineral

B is probably wrong because solar power is not a resource that Earth produces, rather it is something humans extract from the Sun

C is the most likely answer because forests are classified as natural resources

D is probably wrong because farmland can be made by humans

A natural resource is a resource that cannot be made by humans. This resource is most likely difficult to reproduce. Since it takes hundreds upon hundreds of years to grow a forest, this makes it a resource only natural to the Earth that will eventually deplete itself.

You might be interested in
In 1938 Germany took control of Austria in what was known as
timurjin [86]
It’s known as Anschluss
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following groups did not settle in large numbers in the west after the civil war?
Lostsunrise [7]
The correct answer is B. Japanese immigrants

There was high racial prejudice against them which eventually led to the gentleman's agreement between Japan and the US which was supposed to deal with the issues. The US would protect the Japanese people and would allow immigration, while Japan would prevent their people from emigrating.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct sequence of events when a juvenile is believed to have committed a crime.
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

An arrest, an intake process, an adjudicatory hearing, then a disposition hearing

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Explain how Francis Drake increased tensions between England and Spain 1560-1590 (12)
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

Francis Drake was an English privateer in the service of the Crown of England who served his nation during the wars against Spain in the late 1500s. Drake participated in numerous battles for the English navy, but especially gained his fame as a privateer who sabotaged numerous ships of the Spanish merchant marine causing serious economic and material losses to the Kingdom of Spain. Since Spain did not recognize the figure of the corsair, he was classified as a pirate by the Iberian authorities, which exposed him to eventual death penalties if captured. The English crown, on the other hand, legally recognized him as a privateer and endorsed his actions, which generated an ethical and ideological conflict within the war that both nations had with each other, at a time when formalities and the value of the word had a special significance even in war conflicts.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these situations was only possible after the Neolithic Revolution
adelina 88 [10]

What are the options?

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What nation was involved in the fighting on the Eastern European front during world war I
    8·2 answers
  • Read the statement from an argumentative essay. Capitalism is superior to socialism because it promotes the interests of both th
    11·2 answers
  • What was the purposes of “killing centers”?
    14·1 answer
  • What economic advantages did the north have over the south
    9·1 answer
  • Matthew and Ryan are devout Christian Fundamentalists and believe that homosexuality is against God's will and that homosexuals
    9·1 answer
  • When Egypt made cotton it's biggest crop what major risk did it take
    10·1 answer
  • What issues will be important when you vote for president
    8·1 answer
  • Introduction about the French Government in history?
    5·1 answer
  • Read these two passages, which were written by leaders in India and South Africa fighting to overthrow repressive governments, a
    6·1 answer
  • Which historical court case from 1967 decided that any and all state law prohibiting Interracial marriages was Unconstitutional?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!