Mobilization:the act of gearing up for war
Answer:
Freedom to bear arms for self-defense. Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail. Freedom from taxation by royal prerogative, without the agreement of Parliament. Freedom of fines and forfeitures without a trial.
Explanation:
Freedom to bear arms for self-defense. Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail. Freedom from taxation by royal prerogative, without the agreement of Parliament. Freedom of fines and forfeitures without a trial.
Answer:
Split US allegiance--During World War I, the US people were split on who to help and the same was true for Jefferson and Madison during the Napoleonic Wars between Britain and France.
Jefferson and Madison attempted to remain neutral in the conflict between Britain and France during the Napoleonic Wars because NE had a trade relationship with Britain but many believed the US owed an alliance to France after they helped during the Revolution.
Wilson faced a similar issue as immigration had created a diverse US population with support on both sides of World War I. Creating an alliance with either side could split the country and create problems within the US.
Answer:
John Felix Anthony Cena Jr. is an American professional wrestler, actor, rapper, and television presenter. He is currently signed to WWE where he wrestles part-time. He is also the current host of Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader? on Nickelodeon and has starred in various films.
Explanation:
Answer:
That depends on what you mean by "presented."
Cases are typically appealed to the US Supreme Court on a
petition for a writ of certiorari, which includes a legal
brief prepared by the attorney or attorneys for the petitioner
(similar to a plaintiff). The respondent(s)' attorney(s) may oppose
the petition with their own brief.
If the Court grants certiorari, the case may be scheduled for
oral argument, allowing each side 30 minutes to explain to
the justices why their client should prevail. During oral argument,
the justices ask questions about the case or relevant precedents
and points of law (although the justices are often better prepared
than the attorneys, already know the answers to the questions, and
may have already decided how they are going to vote after case
conference).
-Hops
