Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
It would damage trade relations between the countries
Answer:
All the presidents listed failed because of the economy.
Explanation:
Gerald Ford underwent a time where wages weren't rising, and he had pardoned Richard Nixon. Jimmy Carter beat Ford and presided over record inflation. George H. W. Bush had to deal with a recession.
Answer:
The motives behind the United States declining aid to the Hungarian patriots in 1849 was because they did not want to waste resources nor time on something like a rebellion when they were busy expanding themselves. They also were having conflicts with China and Europe to deal with and did not want get into another.
Explanation:
