The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.
- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.
- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).
To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :
brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
No, Senator Thompson can not do this as all matters dealing with money must start in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Explanation:
The rule comes from the U.S. Consitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. If the bill was drafted in the U.S. House and passed the U.S. House Subcommittee, then passed by the full U.S. House, Senator Thompson could go around and ask other Senators to vote for the Bill, but he could not have written the Bill and have it start in the U.S. Senate.
