Answer:
The contact hypothesis did not work because there were still separations of groups according to their skin color.
Explanation:
Gordon Allport proposed the contact hypothesis, which was a strategy used to reduce social conflicts due to prejudices.
The method of contact hypothesis was carried out through the interaction of groups of people; for example, in schools, in supermarkets or buses, in this way, when interacting and communicating, prejudices are diminished.
<em>Allport established optimal conditions to implement the contact hypothesis:
</em>
- The support of the authorities.
- The equality of condition between the groups.
- The cooperation between the groups.
- Promote common goals.
For example, in the case of the first attempts at desegregation, they failed because the separations in society continued to exist according to their skin color, so the contact hypothesis did not have good results.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
grass tops
Explanation:
Interest groups have a variety of tools at their disposal when developing strategies for lobbying, such as trying a grass tops strategy and harnessing the influence of community leaders and other prominent individuals.
Grass top strategy focuses on influencing well connected individuals such as donors, opinion individuals and influential individuals in lobbying beneficial policies. On the other hand, grassroot strategy focuses directly on the power of the people in influencing policies.
Answer:
short term memory
Explanation:
Short term memory refers to the memory that exist for a short span of time. Such memories are stored and active for a short period. These memories are the result of the information that are currently stored and are a result of the active sensory memories. Short term memories are subject to few seconds and can be stored for some seconds only.
In the given excerpt, Aarav has stored the memory of Dante's phone number in his short term memory. For some seconds he was able to recall them, but after a while it was blurred from his mind.
The ultimate colonial objection to the Sugar Act was that it was taxation without representation. The colonists were being taxed from Great Britain without someone representing their rights and ideas in Parliament in London. They were also unfairly being taxed to bring more money into the colonial superpower, instead of it being used for the Thirteen Colonies.
