1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
3 years ago
13

Some have argued that there really was very little difference in the use of atomic bombs and conventional bombs against Japan. D

o you agree or disagree? Why?
History
1 answer:
True [87]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Disagree. The sheer amount of force that an atomic bomb had was insane. Conventonial bombs would NOT have killed as many innocents.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did technological developments affect the growth of the industrial economy?
vredina [299]
Made production faster by creating new machinery and creating ways to automate other product manufacturing
5 0
3 years ago
Seperate answers with a comma but two word answers don't put a comma between (ex. Bobby Hill,) RANDOW ANSWERS WILL BE REPORTED
kari74 [83]

Answer:

My name is _Cleveland______ _Brown________ and I am proud to be right back in my hometown with my new family. There's _Old's_______ Friends and _New_____ Friends and even a Bear____!

Explanation:

I love watching the Cleveland Show I always watch it on Comedy Central

4 0
3 years ago
Now that you have learned about four of the greatest Aztec inventions, which one is your favorite? Imagine you are a child in an
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

cuicacalli

a school where students learned ceremonial songs, chants, and studied history of the Aztec people

telpochcalli

a military school where you learn how to fight.

calmécac

a military school that is enhanced with the study of math painting and history

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following countries best reflects the state-building strategies and outcomes detailed in the passage?
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer: A

Cuba in 1959

Explanation: I took the test :)

6 0
3 years ago
Rawls, thinks that people are justified in owning<br> the objects and wealth that they do when
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

Rawls, thinks that people are justified in owning the objects and wealth they have when there are fair opportunities for any citizen within a region to own as well.

Explanation:

John Rawls was a philosopher and author of An Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism and Peoples' Law. He argued that the unequal distribution of income in a country and the social inequality caused by that distribution was something extremely wrong and that led nations to social failure.

He had arguments that showed that it was not fair that only a part of the population could possess goods and wealth. This would only be justified in a population where everyone had the same socioeconomic opportunities to own material goods of wealth, value and luxury.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the causes of new diplomatic tensions in the later 19th century?
    8·1 answer
  • Why were the theories of Isaac Newton considered revolutionary at the time? He argued that mathematics could be used to measure
    8·1 answer
  • Why did America go to war with Spain?
    7·2 answers
  • How are causes heard by the supreme court
    15·1 answer
  • analyze how the supreme court case brown v board of education has been important in the struggle for civil rights
    11·1 answer
  • How did the railway change peoples lives
    11·1 answer
  • Which began after the fall of the Western Roman Empire?
    5·2 answers
  • What were the two reasons
    9·2 answers
  • Why did British laws and taxes in Colonial America lead to protest and<br> violence?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the reconstruction amendment?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!