I believe the Monroe doctrine did not state number 3.
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
Answer:
Quota- this is a set amount to receive/give.
Tariffs could also be applied to make it more expensive.
The Roman Constitution was a historical, unwritten set of guidelines and precedents that changed with Rome's needs. It served as model of administrative checks and balances and ensured the separation of powers
Answer:
Inbreeding
Explanation:
The offspring from mating of individuals in a close group can cause inbreeding. The genetic disorders present in both mates will pass along the offspring without the possibility of correction, causing genetic abnormality.
The inbreeding can occur naturally in a way to guarantee the propagation of the offspring. The result of this mating is the increasing of homozygous, which can result in lack of variancy. By the other hand, it can enhance a similar characteristic as well as a genetic problem.
For example, in a crop of clones organisms a disease which has affected one crop can spread more easily through the community of clones than non-clones crops of the same specie.
