The correct answer is D) the British Parliament put India under the rule of the British government and monarchy.
<em>An effect of the Sepoy Rebellion was that the British Parliament put India under the rule of the British government and monarchy.
</em>
In 1858, the British dissolved the Sepoy Rebellion, also known as the Indian Mutiny. The Sepoy Indian troops initiated what it was considered the first independence war in India. The result was that the British monarchy dissolved the East India Company and the British government directly ruled India. The first things that the new government did was to reorganize the finances and the army. So it is true that an effect of the Sepoy Rebellion was that the British Parliament put India under the rule of the British government and monarchy.
<h3>I think it's helpful for you ✌️❤️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️</h3>
Thanks✔️✔️
<span>They drafted, or conscripted, most of their troops. For the North, it was the first draft in U.S. history and not well received (see the New York Draft Riots). The Union draft also allowed men to pay others to take their place in the draft.
The Southern draft was enforced by the Confederate Home Guard, technically made up of men too old or too young to serve at the front. My ggggrandfather was a native of Winston County, Alabama, and was shot in the back when he refused the Home Guard's request that he report the Confederate Army. (Winston County, btw, tried to succeed from Alabama when Alabama succeeded from the Union earning it the name of the Free State of Winston.)
Early on, both sides filled their armies with volunteers. However, as the war went on and casulties mounted, volunteers became few and far between, resulting in the draft.
There were no mercenary units recruited by either the North or South to fill the armies. However, Union recruitment officers made a point to greet incoming immigrant ships and impress military-age immigrants into the army.</span>
My answer is Louisiana purchase.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Yes, the growing number of interest groups support US Senator Byrd’s conclusion.
There is too much money involved in interest groups, and an increasing number of these groups have been appearing in the United States political scene. Senator Byrd was worried about this increased number and lack of control over these groups. Let's have in mind that these interest groups hire lobbyists to negotiate with legislators and offer support. But the US Congressmen had to be aware that it is the citizens that voted for them and put them in Congress as their representatives. So they serve the people, not the particular agendas of interest groups.
