Hitler was the type of man who believed in something so much that his words alone influenced an entire continent to follow him. The problem was his belief was that the aryan race was superior to blacks, Jews, gypsies and poles (not excluding political prisoners and homosexuals of course). This paired with the fascist doctrine of constant feeding of the military industrial complex fueled world war 2. The economy is actually able to extremely benifet off of war (it is what got us out of the Great Depression after all). War is also a great way to bring people together (like the 9/11 attacks or pear harbor). He certainly did want to rule the world, but it was that same racist idea of aryan superiority that he wanted to impose. If he had gotten his way, he would’ve enslaved, raped, pillaged and killed his way for 20 years until the majority of Europe and Russia was aryan. He didn’t even particularly like Italians, and just used them as a stepping stone to get superiority in the region. Maybe if he had won ww2 then there would’ve been a pseudo Cold War between the two (which means more war for mister Hitler and his Nazis).
Answer:
Texan troops in the area became isolated and short of supplies
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is 4. The Hartford Convention led to the end of the Federalist Party.
Explanation:
The Hartford Convention was held in Connecticut between December 1814 and January 1815 by members of the Federalist Party. In said convention, these representatives discussed issues related to the War of 1812 and expressed their lack of support for the American cause and the total lack of meaning of said conflict, thus demonstrating their total antinomy towards the Democratic-Republican Party that was holding the presidency through James Madison.
It was a risky political move, with which the Federalists sought to win popular support to force an end to the war and a reconciliation with the British Empire. But this movement failed due to the American victory in the conflict, which led the Federalist Party to total discredit and to its loss of support at the popular level.
I believe that they are the following:
1. Monarchs do not have absolute authority.
2. The monarchs must have parliament's consent to suspend laws, levy taxes, or maintain an army.
3. The monarch cannot interfere with parliamentary elections and debates.
4. The people have a right to petition the government and to have a fair and speedy trial by a jury of their
