1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Contact [7]
3 years ago
7

The answer and I will mark Brainalist

Mathematics
1 answer:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: G would be your answer, or c = 8k + 24

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
What are the coordinates of the midpoint between (3, -5) and (-7, 2)?
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

(-2,-3/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Midpoint formula=(x1+x2/2, y1+y2/2)

So...

(3+-7/2, -5+2/2) =

(-2, -3/2)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The line plot shows how many siblings each student has. how many more students have only one sibling than at least 3 siblings
Vaselesa [24]
So for this you must ignore the student with 2. 


then you see how many in order

1-6 siblings
1-5 siblings
2-3 siblings

add up the left coulumn to get 4 people have more than 3 siblings
8 0
4 years ago
$67.50 with 8% sales tax
inna [77]

Answer:

The answer is 73.05

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the answer simply multiply 67.50 by 0.08 and then add that to 67.50

and since we are talking about dollars round to the nearest cent

6 0
3 years ago
Rothamsted Experimental Station (England) has studied wheat production since 1852. Each year many small plots of equal size but
podryga [215]

Answer:

(a) 0.653

(b) 0.0198

(c) Yes, after testing we conclude that the population variance of annual wheat production for the first plot is larger than that for the second plot.

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) We are give the sample of one year annual production of wheat (in pounds) ;

4.46, 4.21, 4.40, 4.81, 2.81, 2.90, 4.93, 3.54, 4.16, 4.48, 3.26, 4.74, 4.97, 4.02, 4.91, 2.59

For calculating sample variance, firstly we will calculate mean of the above data;

Mean of above data, X_1bar = Sum of all values ÷ n (no. of values)

                                 = \frac{4.46 + 4.21+4.40+.......+4.91+2.59}{16} = 4.074

Sample Variance, s_1^{2} = \frac{\sum (X-X_1bar)^{2} }{n-1} = \frac{(4.46-4.074)^{2}+(4.21-4.074)^{2}+.........+(4.91-4.074)^{2}+(2.59-4.074)^{2} }{16-1} = 0.653

(b) Another sample for annual wheat production (in pounds);

3.89, 3.81, 3.95, 4.07, 4.01, 3.73, 4.02, 3.78, 3.72, 3.96, 3.62, 3.76, 4.02, 3.73, 3.94, 4.03

Mean of above data, X_2bar = Sum of all values ÷ n (no. of values)

                                 = \frac{3.89+3.81+3.95.......+3.94+4.03}{16} = 3.88

Sample Variance, s_2^{2} = \frac{\sum (X-X_2bar)^{2} }{n-1} = \frac{(3.89-3.88)^{2}+(3.81-3.88)^{2}+.........+(3.94-3.88)^{2}+(4.03-3.88)^{2} }{16-1} = 0.0198

(c) Now, we have to test the claim that population variance of annual wheat production for the first plot is larger than that for the second plot i.e.;

       Null Hypothesis, H_0 : \sigma_1^{2} = \sigma_2^{2}   or H_0 : \frac{\sigma_1^{2} }{\sigma_2^{2} } = 1

Alternate Hypothesis, H_0 : \sigma_1^{2} > \sigma_2^{2}   or H_0 : \frac{\sigma_1^{2} }{\sigma_2^{2} } >  1

The test statistics used here is;

                           \frac{s_1^{2} }{s_2^{2} }* \frac{\sigma_1^{2} }{\sigma_2^{2}}  ~ F_n__1-1_,n_2-1   where, n_1 = 16 and n_2 =16

   Test Statistics = \frac{0.653 }{ 0.0198}* 1 ~ F_1_5_,_1_5

                          = 32.98

Since, we are not provided with any significance level so we assume it to be 5% and at this level, the F table gives critical value of 2.4282.

<em>Since our test statistics is higher than the critical value and it falls in the rejection region so we have sufficient evidence to reject null hypothesis and conclude that the population variance of annual wheat production for the first plot is larger than that for the second plot.</em>

8 0
3 years ago
What is the value of the sum? - 3/8+ 5/10 <br> -11/16<br> -1/16<br> 1/16<br> 1/4<br> -1/4
mafiozo [28]
First, you must convert the decimals to have the same denominator.

Find the least common multiple of both fractions' denominators:

Multiples of 8: {8,16,24,32,40}
Multiples of 10: {10,20,30,40}

The least common multiple of 8 and 10 is 40.

Multiply the fractions by a number that will make their denominator 40:

- \frac{3}{8} \times  \frac{5}{5} = - \frac{15}{40}
\frac{5}{10} \times \frac{4}{4} = \frac{20}{40}

Now you can add these fractions together:

-\frac{15}{40} + \frac{20}{40} = \frac{5}{40}

Simplify this fraction:

\frac{5}{40} \div \frac{5}{5} = \frac{1}{8}

The answer should be 1/8.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A single die is thrown what is the probability the result is:
    13·2 answers
  • Ginger practices daily for the upcoming
    12·1 answer
  • Is the following conditional true?<br> If cs 2, then c &lt; 4.<br> yes<br> no
    10·1 answer
  • A rectangle with vertices (0,0), (6,0), (6,2), and (0,2) is rotated around the y-axis. Which of the following is the horizontal
    6·2 answers
  • The lateral area of a cone is 574 cm^2. The radius is 19.6 cm. What is the slant height to the nearest tenth of a centimeter?
    9·2 answers
  • Suppose that the average number of airline crashes in a country is 2 per month. (a) What is the probability that there will be a
    12·1 answer
  • Line m is perpendicular to line n if the slope of line m is 3/2 what is the slope of line n
    13·1 answer
  • 5x-4y when x=-2 and y=3
    6·1 answer
  • Y=x+2 solved &amp; graphed
    6·2 answers
  • Find the diameter of a circle whose Circumfrence is 66 m​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!