Answer:
The best answer to the question: Impromptu and extemporaneous speaking differ in which of the following ways?, would be, C: Extemporaneous is speaking from a prepared outline; impromptu is speaking with little or no preparation or notes.
Explanation:
In public speaking, preparation is always key to what will be delivered and also how it will be delivered. It takes into account not just the words and structure of a speech, but also the characteristics of the audience and the location where the speech will take place. Preparedeness on the part of the speaker is also important, but also, the naturality with which the sepaker engages the audience, shows confidence and knowledge on what he is saying and delivers the words. There are in general 4 methods for delivering a speech, and two of them are these: Extemporaneous, which means a well-planned speech where there is an outline but that is delivered in a conversational manner and the impromptu speech, which is literally when someone is thrown into the arena to deliver some words. This last one is characterized by its manner of absolute unpreparedness. There are no notes, no practice, just the words that spring into the speaker´s mind. This is why the answer is C.
I believe the correct answer: is it suggests that one
opponent is much smaller than the other.
In this excerpt from the newspaper "A David and
Goliath Battle Rages Over Sunshine Park", the mentioning the David and
Goliath suggest that one of the opponents in much smaller than the other. This
Biblical parallel alludes that even If regarded as the “small opponent”, Chelsea
Spree has an opportunity to win, just as David had.
It also explains God loves you but you have to be patient...
I read many chapters in the bible, I absolutely love it.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. It characterizes the County Attorney as someone desirous of showing respect to women, even if he does not mean it.
Explanation:
The question refers to Glaspell's 'A Jury of Her Peers,' in which a woman kills her husband because of her unhappiness with the marriage. Namely, the woman felt trapped, helpless, cornered in this marriage even though the husband didn't physically or mentally abuse her. She felt as though her freedom was taken from her and it all culminated in her killing him, even though he was supposedly a good man.
The police comes to investigate the scene, along with the County Attorney and several neighbors. These neighbors, namely women, understand the motives behind the murder and are actually the ones to solve it whereas the men don't want to take them seriously. The County Attorney shows 'the gallantry of a young politician,' meaning that he pretends to respect what the women are trying to say, even though he doesn't really respect them. Politicians are stereotypically known to lie and hide their true thoughts, which is why the term is used here.
