The correct answer is A) Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?
The other options of the question are B) Who pay for this research and what possible motivations would they have to skew the results in a way that would benefit them? C) What are the average mortality rates associated with diabetes and does this risk offset the benefits of sitting comfortably at work? D) How did the researchers measure how many hours the subject sits per day and what qualifies as an official diabetes diagnosis?
A new high-profile study reports a strong connection between how long people sit every day and how likely they are to develop diabetes. The question that best represents a critical examination of the research is " Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?"
A critical examination is the kind of evaluation approach that uses a systemathic and logical way to understand the phenomenon at study. The issue is studied in a systematic way to analyze the content and the variables in order to find the best alternative for the solution. That is why the question "A" best represents critical examination.
Answer:
they wanted to avenge the people who died and make sure that this would not happen again
Explanation:
Explanation:
Institutional leadership infuses values through establishing narratives that connect the past, present, and future, interpreting external values requirements by matching and connecting them with traditional operational identity, and guaranteeing their embodiment by supporting exploratory value dialogue processes.
Okay. Montessori schools have to do with the children being creative with their learning, while the teacher helps them with giving them activities that suit them. It does not put children at risk for poor study habits or produce children who have little confidence in their academic abilities. B and D are eliminated. It does not emphasize social over academic achievement. Both are just as important. It can help observe the child's behavior and use materials to see what they are like over the years. The answer is C.
The promise made is, In these modest surroundings, they took the historic Tennis Court Oath, with which they agreed not to disband until a new French constitution had been adopted
On June 20, 1789, members of the French Third Estate took the Tennis Court Oath (French: Serment du Jeu de Paume) at the tennis court built for the Palace of Versailles in 1686. [1] Their vow to "do not separate and meet again as needed until the Constitution of the Kingdom is settled" [1] became an important event of the French Revolution.
The Estates General was convened to deal with the national financial and agricultural crises, but shortly after the convocation in May 1789, especially by order or by the head (reducing third power), I got stuck on a typical problem. Real estate, much more than the other two real estates). On June 17, the Third Estate became known as the Parliament, led by Onore Gabriel Riqueti and Comte de Mirabeau.
Learn more about Oath here: brainly.com/question/1809645
#SPJ4
