The first sentence is referring to a secondary reinforce while
the second sentence is referring to primary reinforce. A primary reinforce are
usually base on biological things such as the water we drink or food that we
eat while the secondary reinforce is base on the conditions that humans is
reinforcing such as money or grades.
Answer:
iwn ko bakit nag oa quetion ka
A lawyer that specializes in family law would spend a lot of time drafting documents related to divorce, adoption, custody, child support, surrogacy, and other related matters.
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
Because they are very nice person
