1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoray [572]
3 years ago
9

Explain three important differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, and why each document was approv

ed at the time it was written.
History
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The difference between the Articles of Confederation and Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation are the rules that were agreed by the United States of America in the 18th century whereas the constitution is the rules that democratic countries and other legalized institutions develop to implement law and order in their body.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is due process? What might happen if the constitution did not guarantee this right?
Alex_Xolod [135]
Due process is the right of a criminal to go through the process of conviction. This is especially demonstrated through the police line "all criminals are innocent until proven guilty in the court of law". If the constitution did not guarantee this right, then the police could arrest anyone. Hope this helps! Let me know if you have more questions!
8 0
4 years ago
Why did cities lead to the creation of governments?
Evgen [1.6K]
The Urban Revolution started realizing they needed a money support system and something to provide people jobs.
I hope this helps.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is accurate about most women who worked outside the home during the Great Depression
PSYCHO15rus [73]
What are the answers?  So I know the proper answer to give you.
5 0
3 years ago
Record at least eight examples of how interest groups are good or bad for democracy.
solong [7]
List of Cons of Interest Groups

1. They would often seek for the minority of people. 
Interest groups lead to pluralism, which critics contend that there is no common good, as there are many conflicting interests in society. What is good for one individual can be bad for other people. Critics also argue that interest groups would interfere with democracy, as they seek out benefits for minorities rather than the greater good of the majority. For example, the National Rifle Association has repeatedly blocked gun-control legislations, despite the fact that most citizens in the US actually want stricter laws on firearms.

2. They only have one track in mind. 
As interest groups usually have a single track in mind, they would only think about and look at their personal opinions, and not at those of the majority.

3. They are only effective for themselves. 
Another big argument by critics about these groups is that their system can really be effective only for economic interest groups, which normally have greater financial resources at their disposal. It is also believed that these groups would ignore the interests of the poor in favor of the middle and upper-class, who have more money and time to contribute.

4. They would commit serious crimes. 
According to past news, there are interest groups that have committed serious crimes, such as corruption, bribery, fraud, etc. There are even those who were involved in some cases and accused of giving threats to domestic social orders and extremists.

List of Pros of Interest Groups

1. They use a democratic process. 
Interest groups contribute a helpful democratic process to protect certain individuals as alternative in daunting the majority. Because of this, many people have the freedom to express and speak their suggestions and opinions.

2. They check the power of majorities. 
In the US political system, there exist the principles of democracy, which include the majority rule, but there is also the protection of rights of people who do not belong to the majority. Interest groups, such as those based on gender, ethnic and religious identities, can perform important checks on the powers of the majority.

3. They have the ability to motivate legislators. 
These groups can easily motivate legislators in promulgating their beliefs optimistically.

4. They allow for better representation of interests. 
Members of interest groups and other social movements believe that they should better advance their causes and interests, whether it is protecting civil rights, voting rights and the environment, by uniting themselves for collective action. By doing so, they demonstrate strength in numbers when it comes to politics.

5 0
3 years ago
As a result of the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, A.it took decades for segregation to be declared unconstitutional. B. it took a fe
Anettt [7]
A. it took a few decades. The court ruled that even if they are separate, as long as they are equal, it was okay.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How can the Supreme Court check the growth of presidential power?
    7·1 answer
  • Europeans first arrived in Latin America during which time period?
    10·2 answers
  • How many mps voted that animals dont feel emotions?
    10·1 answer
  • What is culture?
    10·2 answers
  • John f Kennedy missle crisis
    12·1 answer
  • Who was first able to monopolize the spice trade and open trade with China?
    5·1 answer
  • How were Japanese Americans treated during World War II? Why did some Americans feel this was necessary? Were their fears justif
    6·2 answers
  • Which statements correctly characterize Asoka's reign? Select all correct answers. It was brutal both before and after his conve
    11·1 answer
  • Does anyone know this please help thank you
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Tariff of 1816 help to increase nationalism and the economy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!