Answer:
A) Year 1 cost of goods sold
B) Year 2 cost of goods sold
D) Year 2 beginning inventory
Explanation:
A) Year 1 expense of merchandise sold : The Current year cost of Goods Sold is processed by deducting finishing stock from Opening Inventory and Purchases made during the year. So in the event that the completion stock isn't right, at that point the result of above calculation will not be right so the Year 1 expense of merchandise sold for example (Current year cost of Goods Sold) will be inaccurate.
D) Year 2 starting stock: year 2 starting stock is equivalent to year 1 completion stock. So on the off chance that off-base stock estimation is made at end of earlier year, at that point current year opening worth will be carried on as off-base.
B) Year 2 expense of merchandise sold: The explanation is same as ans q(i.e. Year 1 expense of merchandise sold) as off-base convey forward opening stock worth will bring about wrong calculation of cost of products sold for year 2.
Answer:
The correct answer is equal to price.
Explanation:
A perfectly competitive firm is a price taker. This is because of the large number of firms, no single firm is able to influence the price. So each firm faces a horizontal demand curve. This horizontal line shows demand, marginal revenue, and average revenue.
The price level is determined at the point where the marginal cost is equal to price. The marginal revenue is always equal to price because the price is fixed at a point, each output level is supplied at the same price.
Answer:
Beta distribution
Explanation:
Beta distribution In probability theory
is regarded as a part of continuous probability distributions with a defined interval which could be 0 and 1, and it is characterized with two positive parameters (α and β) which is seen as
as exponents of the random variable .
It should be noted that Beta distribution probability is commonly used to model the inherent variability of activity time estimates in project management
The answer would be a legal price above which a good/service cannot be sold at.
Answer:
Ben would pay more in taxes.
Explanation:
A progressive income tax increases the tax rate as the taxpayer earns more money.
In this case, Ben would be taxed as earnings $60,000 which is probably a much higher tax rate than the applicable one for $30,000. If we use the current tax brackets for 2020, Ben would fall under the 22% tax bracket while both Cathy and Dylan would fall under the 12% tax bracket. Obviously Ben would pay much more in taxes.
