Answer:
A. the viewpoint of those who supported the Constitution (:
Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>intermediate sanctions.
People who are punished with </span><span>intermediate sanctions. usually, have to be monitored by government officials throughout the day even though they're not placed in jail. This usually is done by requiring them to give reports on their location every couple of hours and require them to find a job through government agencies.</span>
It was determined that the confession made by Connelly should not have been suppressed (or withheld) and the Supreme Court overturned the state of Colorado's decision to suppress the evidence. This was determined based on the case of Miranda vs. Arizona because there was not violation of the due process clause.