No, the cost of the annual premium for 10 years was less than the accident claims
When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4
Answer:
A
constitutional monarchy
B constitutional republic
Explanation:
In constitutional monarchy, the power within the government is shared by the member of the monarch family and the parliament. Election allow the people to select the members of parliament who will fight for their Ernestine. So election basically limit the power of the monarch under this system.
In constitutional republic, people have the power to elect the head of state and the head of the nation. But most of the time, members from different parties are elected to fill in the job. Since these parties tend to have different interest, they will naturally limit each other's influence within the government.
Descartes cannot be certain that God would not allow an evil demon or computer to systematically deceive humanity. But he believes that God is a more sensible being and formal compared to all of us that he created. He believes that God has a reason for everything because he knows everything.