1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
3 years ago
6

Why did Russia switch sides and become a Central Power?

History
2 answers:
almond37 [142]3 years ago
7 0
Coz they were losing
sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Immediately after their accession to power in Russia in November 1917, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, had approached the Central Powers to arrange an armistice and withdraw from a war they saw as the major obstacle to their plan of providing food and land to the long-impoverished Russian peasant population.

You might be interested in
Write a paragraph explaining why it has been so difficult to make peace between the
sergey [27]

Answer: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the ongoing struggle between Israelis and Palestinians that began in the early 20th century. The conflict is wide-ranging, and the term is also used in reference to the earlier phases of the same conflict, between the Zionist yishuv and the Arab population living in Palestine under Ottoman and then British rule. It forms part of the wider Arab-Israeli conflict. The remaining key issues are: mutual recognition, borders, security, water rights, control of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, Palestinian freedom of movement and finding a resolution to the refugee question. The violence resulting from the conflict has prompted international actions, as well as other security and human rights concerns, both within and between both sides, and internationally. In addition, the violence has curbed expansion of tourism in the region, which is full of historic and religious sites that are of interest to many people around the world.

if you want more info go here =https://www.ukessays.com/essays/politics/the-israeli-palestinian-conflict-politics-essay.php

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What unprecedented decision did FDR make in 1940?
kozerog [31]
The new deal which was to help the farmer out during the great depression and during the dust bowl incident
4 0
3 years ago
14. Many African political groups were organized into
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

B. Mini States

Explanation:

Given that Mini-States is a political term used in describing independent states that has the feature of either a smaller population or smaller landmass or both.

Many scholars believed that there are quite several African countries that fall into the category of a Mini-State.

This includes the likes of Botswana, Cape Verde, Comoros, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, the Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Mauritius, Namibia, São Tomé e Príncipe, Seychelles, and Swaziland.

Hence, in this case, many African political groups were organized into "MINI-STATES"

7 0
3 years ago
2. In what case previous to this was it ruled that it was OK for black and white students to be “separate but equal”? When was t
nexus9112 [7]
Plessy v. Ferguson-  basically Louisiana passed a law saying the black people need it separate car when traveling on train not on the same as a white person.
Plessy was 1/8 African descent (was born free and other 7/8 was of European descent ) and under Louisiana rule he had to sit on a black car. eventually he sat on white only car and got into trouble, just like Rosa Parks. and he was eventually got arrested and tried.
5 0
3 years ago
Do you think having only two parties in power in the US is good or bad for our country? Why?​
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. <u>This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad </u>

Here is another argument

While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. <u>This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.</u>    

Explanation:

It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.  

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did ancient greeces land contribute to rivalry
    12·1 answer
  • What is history? give me references​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following were fractions in the weaking of the roman empire​
    13·1 answer
  • Read the passage.
    15·1 answer
  • What did Africans bring to british colonies
    7·1 answer
  • Yo i joined this app before all yall noobs and my other acc is lilkingk
    12·1 answer
  • NO FAKE ANSWEERS I NEED THIS DONE TODAY WHOEVER GETS IT CORRECT GETS BRAINLIEST!! I NEED EACH BOX FILLED AND NO LINKS!!
    5·1 answer
  • By the end of 1967, US military leaders claimed they were nearing a victory in Vietnam, but the ______ and January 1968 proved t
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer,
    12·1 answer
  • -The Navigation Acts limited the colonial economy in all of the following ways EXCEPT:
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!