Answer: 390 to 600 milliseconds
Explanation: MIT researchers have found an answer in a new study that shows humans need about 390 to 600 milliseconds to detect and react to road hazards, given only a single glance at the road, with younger drivers detecting hazards nearly twice as fast as older drivers.
Generally, the elements of drama that reveal the traits and motivations of the character to the audience are plot and dialogue, but other elements may do this as well.
Short answer:
- It hurts Waverly when her mother tries to make it look better, so she does not like it.
- The best torture is not about physical pain; it is about mental torture.
Explain and support your ideas/claims with text evidence.
Her mother does her hair. It can be seen in the discussion. Her mother "twisted and yanked on my thick black hair until she formed two tightly wound pigtails" in the morning. Waverly hated it when her mother did her hair. This text shows Her mother twists and yanks her hair into tight pigtails, indicating she was upset with her hairstyle. She disliked her mother's hairstyle.
"We do torture. best torture. "
Understanding the meaning of a lesson is less important to me than learning it. Throughout the story, Waverly uses a number of methods. It was not the "best torture." Torture does not have to be painful to be effective. Tormenting someone's mind requires great pain. Because he is mentally tortured, Waverly is good at chess. So, her mother was correct when she said that "We torture people all the time." It is the best thing that could happen. " "We do torture." "The best torture," she says, without referring to physical pain. For her, the best way to torture someone is to make them feel bad about themselves. The best torture.
Not a subject to control or rule by another
"If you are like me, such a law would be a catastrophe and would only mean one thing: the end of life as we know it"
Illogical conclusions shows a cause-and-effect relationship that does not exist, based on something that doesn't make sense. To find an illogical conclusion, you can ask how the initial information is linked to the final conclusion. Is there any information that supports it?
