Answer:
it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates
Explanation:
Inference to the best explanation is a term generally in logic or philosophy, which describes a form of inductive reasoning where by individuals draw from the premises about an incident to an explanation for that particular incident.
This explanation is often a claim or reason given, as to why the incident is the way it is. For example: in the occurrence of a particular phenomenon named to be A. Premises B provides the best explanation for A. Therefore, it is most likely that B is true, even though there is no certainty or guarantee of its truth.
Hence, a limitation of inferences to the best explanation is that, "it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates."
Basically, the decision of the supreme court was not respected by other authorities, specially by the president Andrew Jackson, who felt that on the one hand Georgia does not have to respect this ruling and on the other that the supreme court in any case cannot ensure the enforcement of it.
Specifically, the ruling of the court was that only the national government had the power to decide over Indian affairs, and since that power laid in Jackson's hands, he could allow Georgia to proceed with the removal of Cherokee by stating that he ( in the name of the national government) will not intervene. Instead, Jackson's actions were further adding to the removal of the Cherokee.
For the answer to the question above, In the context of psychology's scientific method, a theory is defined as the relatively enduring characteristic of an individual.
I hope my answer helped you. feel free to ask more question. Have a nice day!
Answer:
It satisfies her personal needs simply because she felt uneasy being somewhere she wasn't used to.
