Answer:
These findings present a direct challenge to the assumption that vicariously discharging aggressive impulses reduces aggression.
Explanation:
Some professionals think that people can reduce stress and diminish their feeling of anger by practising sports. Also, they think rough sports are commonly seen as a vicarious way of discharging agressive impulses. This is because spectators feel identified with the athlete, but in the example mentioned before, this theory proved to be inconsistent.
Many public figures defend the correlation between the access to violence in media sources and real-world violence and aggression. Back in the 5th century B.C , even Plato worried about the possible effects of violence and that violent themes in plays would have in society. Nowadays, some scholars speculate that some fans of such media may become more aggressive or immoral. Yet, nothing has been proved, and the correlation between violent media and actual violence are still considered inconclusive. <u>Some social scientists who believe in the correspondence of violence and violent media</u>; however, <u>believe that violent media would cause gamers to lose empathy towards the victims displayed in the media and thus more likely to commit acts of violence.</u>
Aaa ok I will was the night before you going
They all refer to the different types of government systems there are. An example would be that the United States has a a federal government system because both the state governments and national government share equal power.