1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
2 years ago
15

What impact does Industrialization have on the environment?

History
1 answer:
Mamont248 [21]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Industrialization can have a negative impact on our enviroment. It tends to pollute the air around us, pollute waters, increase use such as metals like steel and fossil fuels like coal. However, use of these materials (example:fossil fuels,metals) also have a positive impact on our lives as well, it helps our economy, helps create certain items and objects (example,tire,rubber etc.) and create good relationships with foreign country,specifically in trade! Hope this helps!!! ~PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST~

You might be interested in
4. Close Reading: How does Cameron describe the Sioux Indians who he believes are attacking
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

<h2>Close Reading: How does Cameron describe the Sioux Indians who he believes are attacking white settlements? Answer: Cameron describes the Sioux Indians as being "wild and hostile." since he states that they liked to provoke conflict and war.</h2>

3 0
2 years ago
Was the army segregated before the Tuskegee Airmen Were Formed?
Vlada [557]

The army was segregated before the Tuskegee Airmen were formed

8 0
2 years ago
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
According to the passage what was one way in which the lives of middle class women changed in the 1920’s ?
adoni [48]

I think it is that they got some of their rights in 1920

hope this helps :)

6 0
2 years ago
Who opposed the heliocentric theory ?
notsponge [240]
<span>Nicolaus Copernicus opposed the theory.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Polands solidarity was
    11·2 answers
  • Why people were inspired to fight in the revolution
    9·1 answer
  • Why does solomon say lie about being able to read and write
    14·1 answer
  • What type of revolutionary group was leading the challenge to democracy in Greece?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the United States respond to Japan’s increased military expansion in Asia?
    8·2 answers
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!! PLEASE ANSWER IN YOUR OWN WORDS :)
    7·1 answer
  • What name was given to the laws that segregated Texas after the<br> Civil War?
    10·2 answers
  • How did creating the Department of Homeland Security address the concerns of the 9/11 Commission?
    15·1 answer
  • Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 4 points)
    10·2 answers
  • why did European countries want to send explorers out across the Atlantic sea? What specifically did they hope to find? Were any
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!