The given statement is False.
People who keep domestic animals are strictly liable for any harm inflicted by the animals.
Explanation:
People keep many type of animals as pets in their homes. Some of the common animals which are being kept as pets are:
So if animals kept by people in their homes harm someone, or something, then the owner of the animal is not liable for it. This is because the animal's behavior is not is control of the people. People can only train them, but to always obey the owner is not in the hands of the owner. The nature of animals may not always remain the same, they can cause harm to things or people, but because they are animals, so the owner is not liable.
For example, a man has a dog as pet and his dog went in the neighbor's garden and dig the soil. In this case the owner is not liable for the damage the dog caused. No doubt the owner could help the neighbor in settling the things together but he is not liable for the damage,
Learn more about animals at:
brainly.com/question/11013494
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Both were conquered by Spanish conquistadors
Answer:
its called a civil war
Explanation:
like when the northern states and the and southern states in the U.S. fought over slavery.
TALDOGS stand for
Title
Author
Legend
Date
Orietation
Grid
Scale
I'm sorry I could answer the second part, I don't know what map you are talking about.
the company would need to change the Cognitive <span>component of jerry's attitude
The cognitive component of an attitude consists of one's personal thought or beliefs toward that attitude.
In this case, Jerry already believed that jaguar always make bad products, so the company need to destroy this perception before they could obtain Jerry as a customer</span>
