1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
2 years ago
12

Color are used four time in Schindler list why were certain scenes shot in color

History
1 answer:
Dmitry [639]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Michael Stultz, M.A. Spielberg uses a black and white sepia film stock in Schindler's List to give verisimilitude to the film, to take the edge off the bloodshed, and to strike a contrast between awareness of the Holocaust and apathy. The film begins in color.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did they change marnie in return to halloweentown?
Nadusha1986 [10]
She did<span> not reprise her role as </span>Marnie<span> Piper in "</span>Return to Halloweentown<span>' due to prior commitments to "Big Bad Wolf". She was </span>replaced<span> by Sara Paxton.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
1. The most famous piece of Mesopotamian literature is
Karolina [17]
Good morning!
1. The most famous piece of Mesopotamian literature is the Epic of Gilgamesh, which describes a kind of flood that occurred in the region. Letter c).
2. The Egyptian knowledge of bronze comes from the Hyksa invasions, a people that already dominated and contributed to spread this technique through the region. Letter a).
3. The Nile delta is also called the fertile crescent. Letter D)
4. The code of Hammurabi established a patriarchal society. Letter B).
Hugs!

5 0
3 years ago
How and why was dec 25th chosen as the day to celebrate christmas? (historical answer not religious)
ra1l [238]
December 25th was the day Christ was born so we celebrate Christmas on his birthday 
5 0
3 years ago
How the second world led to the decolonisation of Africa
vagabundo [1.1K]

Most historical events have some unintended consequences. It is in this sense that the European Second World War made a contribution to the decolonisation and political liberation of Africa.

In 1885 at the Berlin Conference, the most powerful European countries, the British, French, German, Spanish, and Portuguese, divided the continent amongst themselves.

However, Africa’s involvement in the two world wars helped fuel the struggle for independence from colonial rule. This was partly because participation of Africans in these wars exposed them to ideas of self-determination and independent rule.

The wars destroyed the economies of European countries. At the end of WW 1, the Europeans turned to Africa to exploit its mineral and agricultural wealth. (Even today some European countries cannot sustain their economies without their former empires) Europe’s growing interest in Africa’s minerals led to her expansion into the interior.

The mining of mineral wealth from Africa required the reorganisation of colonial rule, which meant that the autonomy chiefs and kings in Africa would be increasingly dissolved to make room for a more direct form of government.

The colonial situation: Expropriation of land from Africans to European settlers

The need for agricultural wealth required expropriation of land from African people and giving it to the growing number of Europeans in the colonies. Kenya and Zimbabwe (Southern Rhodesia) are examples of the expropriation of land.

The introduction of taxes like the hut tax and poll tax forced Africans to work for European settlers as the new taxes had to be paid in cash and not as cattle or crops as was the practice before. Exploitation of African laborers by European employers added to the growing resentment among the local people.

Colonial governments developed new methods of agriculture aimed at increasing revenues collected from African farmers. This also required a shift from subsistence crops to cash crops like coffee, cotton and tea.

People were now forced to sell their cash crops through Coffee, Cotton, or Tea marketing boards to colonial markets at low prices, then colonial merchants would in turn sell these crops to an international market at a much higher price. In this way, the Colonies made a lot of profit for the colonisers. As a result, people began to demand an end to colonial rule.

Resistance movements began to rise in Africa. With the growing number of settlers in some colonies, the demand for more land and labor increased tensions between colonial authorities and the white communities that had settled in the colonies.

More land was taken from African people and given to Europeans for settlement. In response to these developments, some chiefs organised rebellions against colonial authorities.

Development of political parties

Another response to colonial transformation was the formation of political parties. These were formed by the small educated group of Africans mainly residing in developing colonial towns. These Africans were educated at missionary schools.

At first, these parties did not seek to create a mass following, but to lobby their respective colonial governments to recognise the civil rights of Africans and protect and recognise the land rights of Africans in rural areas. In Buganda (part of Uganda), the Government of Buganda had a strong lobby and was in constant touch with the colonial office in London about land issues.

Second World War

In this colonial situation, European powers could no longer hold to their empires because they were exhausted and impoverished by the time war ended. France had been humiliated by Germany.

Suddenly, the myth of European invincibility was demythologised. When India became independent from the British in 1947, it set a precedent in challenging British rule and thus inspired many African nationalists.

Soldiers who joined the Seventh battalion of the King’s African Rifles (KAR) (Abaseveni) were posted to India and Burma and were inspired by the Indian and Burmese soldiers, who were compatriots.

6 0
3 years ago
Locke's theory on social contract was different from Hobbes' theory because Locke believed:
kipiarov [429]

The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>

<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
  • Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
  • If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.

Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.

In conclusion, option c is correct.

Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • El segundo mapa: quienes lo ¿elaboran?
    6·1 answer
  • describe the similarities and differences between the new American immigrants and Protestant workers.
    10·2 answers
  • A single DWI conviction can cost a driver up to?
    6·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • What does it mean that the framers of
    9·1 answer
  • Give me a paraph Describe when Columbus and his sailors first discovered new land?
    15·1 answer
  • True or false the green party is popular throughout the world and promotes eco-friendly politics
    5·1 answer
  • The Great Compromise during the writing of the Constitution involved
    15·1 answer
  • Plz help me pleaseeeee
    6·1 answer
  • Happy holidays this is a special gift for you guys so here's the free 100pts
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!